1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Or.
  4. 199 Or.
  5. 199 Or. 415 (1953)
 

MILLER ET UX. v. PROTRKA ET UX.

199 Or. 415 (1953)

261 P.2d 869

MILLER ET UX. v. PROTRKA ET UX.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Affirmed October 21, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bert McCoy, of Eugene, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Cecil Stickney, of Eugene.

Windsor Calkins argued the cause for respondents. On the brief were Calkins & Calkins, of Eugene.

Before LATOURETTE, Chief Justice, and WARNER, TOOZE and PERRY, Justices.

AFFIRMED.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal arises out of a proceeding supplemental to the suit between the same parties reported in Miller et ux. v. Protrka et ux., 193 Or. 585, 238 P.2d 753. In that matter the appellants Protrka gave a supersedeas bond. During the pendency of that appeal, and thereafter, the appellants remained in possession of the subject...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases