MUNGER v. MUNGER


24 N.J. Super. 574 (1953)

95 A.2d 153

EDWINA YEWELL MUNGER, RESPONDENT AND CROSS-APPELLANT, v. CLARENCE A. MUNGER, APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 18, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Meyer L. Sakin argued the cause for respondent and cross-appellant.

Mr. Walter S. Keown argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent.

Before Judges EASTWOOD, BIGELOW and JAYNE.


PER CURIAM.

Except in the detail mentioned below, the judgment will be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the Chancery Division by Judge Burton, whose opinion is reported at 21 N.J.Super. 49 (1952). We might add, with reference to the defense of laches, that "a present and continuing offense is * * * the basis of a decree for separate maintenance. Defendant still abandons his wife. The

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases