HOWARD v. TRUSCO FINANCE COMPANY

34467.

87 Ga. App. 509 (1953)

74 S.E.2d 379

HOWARD v. TRUSCO FINANCE COMPANY.

Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Decided January 28, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peebles & Burnside, for plaintiff in error.

Stevens & Stevens, contra.


TOWNSEND, J.

1. It is the contention of the defendant in the first ground of his amended motion for a new trial that, as against the plea of non est factum, the conditional-sale contract was improperly admitted in evidence upon the testimony of the plaintiff that it was blank at the time of his signature and was subsequently filled out for an amount other than that upon which the parties had agreed. Such contention would be sound if the suit had been brought by the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases