1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 265 Wis.
  5. 265 Wis. 307 (1953)
 

PUTMAN v. DEINHAMER

265 Wis. 307 (1953)

PUTMAN and others, Respondents, vs. DEINHAMER and others, Defendants: HARTFORD ACCIDENT & INDEMNITY COMPANY, Appellant. [Three cases.]

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 1, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Stafford, Pfiffner & Stafford of Chippewa Falls, and oral argument by Harold E. Stafford.

For the respondents there was a brief by Wilcox & Sullivan and Frank E. Betz, all of Eau Claire, and oral argument by Mr. Francis J. Wilcox and Mr. Betz.

FRITZ, C. J.

The defendant Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, hereinafter called "Hartford," issued an automobile liability policy to Raymond Deinhamer covering the period from November 28, 1951, to November 28, 1952. The premium was promptly paid. The policy provided that Hartford could cancel the policy by mailing to the named insured, — at the address stated in the policy,—written notice, when not less than five days thereafter cancellation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases