1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 264 Wis.
  5. 264 Wis. 304 (1953)
 

FRUIT BOAT MARKET v. INDUSTRIAL COMM.

264 Wis. 304 (1953)

FRUIT BOAT MARKET and another, Respondents, vs. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 2, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant Industrial Commission there was a brief by the Attorney General and Mortimer Levitan, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by Mr. Levitan.

For the appellant James R. Mooney there was a brief and oral argument by George D. Young of Milwaukee.

For the respondent there was a brief by Quarles, Spence & Quarles, attorneys, and Kenneth P. Grubb and Norman C. Skogstad of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Skogstad.

CURRIE, J.

The issue on this appeal is whether there is any credible evidence, which, if unexplained, would support the finding of the commission that at the time of Mooney's injury he was engaged in performing service growing out of and incidental to his employment. Hills Dry Goods Co. v. Industrial Comm. (1935), 217 Wis. 76, 85, 258 N. W. 336; and Motor Transport Co. v. Public Service Comm. (1953), 263 Wis. 31, 46...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases