KERBET v. BEHLING


265 Wis. 288 (1953)

KERBET, by Guardian ad litem, and another, Appellants, vs. BEHLING and others, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 1, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Harry R. Glick, attorney, and Gold & McCann of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Ray T. McCann and Mr. Glick.

For the respondents there was a brief by Wilbershide & Wilbershide of Racine, and oral argument by J. C. Wilbershide.


GEHL, J.

Plaintiffs appeal and contend that the trial court overlooked the rule that circumstances as were shown in this case call for close scrutiny and clear explanation of the transaction. Fernhaber v. Cream City Cartage Co. 176 Wis. 75, 186 N. W. 175. The testimony and the circumstances upon which plaintiffs rely in support of their contention that the conveyance and transfer were made to defraud them as creditors are these: Close family relationship existed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases