PAEPCKE v. SEARS, ROEBUCK & CO.


263 Wis. 290 (1953)

PAEPCKE and wife, Respondents, vs. SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

March 3, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Dougherty, Arnold & Waters of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Suel O. Arnold.

For the respondents there was a brief by Charles M. Hanratty and Kersten & McKinnon, attorneys, and Arlo McKinnon of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Hanratty and Mr. McKinnon.


GEHL, J.

Defendant contends, first, that it was not established that it had violated the safe-place statute with respect to lights. There is a sharp conflict in the testimony bearing upon that issue.

Sylvia Paepcke, her sister, her brother-in-law, and her mother each testified that when they entered the lot at about 9:00 p. m. it was in darkness. Police Officer Steuck who arrived at the scene between ten and twelve minutes after

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases