LOSADA v. SENESE MFG. CO.


139 Conn. 414 (1953)

ALPHONSE LOSADA v. SENESE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, INC.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decided January 20, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alvin M. Murray, with whom, on the brief, were Alexander Winnick and Milton Rice, for the appellant (defendant).

Samuel E. Friedman, with whom, on the brief, was Arthur Levy, Jr., for the appellee (plaintiff).

BROWN, C. J., JENNINGS, BALDWIN, INGLIS and O'SULLIVAN, JS.


INGLIS, J.

Inasmuch as the finding of subordinate facts is not subject to correction, the sole question raised on this appeal is whether those facts support the conclusion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover a commission on orders received by the defendant.

The subordinate facts found may be summarized as follows: The plaintiff has been, since before 1945, a manufacturers' representative engaged in procuring...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases