Per Curiam.
There were charges made against respondent, one of which involved conversion of the sum of $128.80, which sum was returned by him, and the others of which involved professional misconduct in matters involving small amounts.
The Referee found that respondent's guilt was established, but that his professional misconduct was not occasioned by dishonest intent or lack of professional ability. The Referee stated that "throughout the hearings...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
