1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 115 Cal.App.2d
  5. 115 Cal.App.2d 428 (1953)
 

LUCE v. SUTTON

Docket No. 15340.

115 Cal.App.2d 428 (1953)

252 P.2d 352

RAYMOND F. LUCE et al., Plaintiffs and Respondents, v. VERNE C. SUTTON, Defendant and Respondent; SAM TRONDHJEM, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One.

January 19, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rosendale, Thomas & Muller for Appellant.

L.W. Wrixon for Respondents.

BRAY, J.

In an action for the price of meat sold and delivered, plaintiffs obtained judgment against both defendants. Defendant Trondhjem alone appeals.

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

1. Was there evidence of agency? 2. Are the findings that defendants were copartners, which findings admittedly are unsupported, fatal to a recovery on the agency theory?

PLEADINGS

In the caption of the complaint defendants were described as "Verne C. Sutton...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases