NANCE v. HITCH

No. 450.

76 S.E.2d 461 (1953)

238 N.C. 1

NANCE v. HITCH.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 12, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bickett & Banks and W. H. Yarborough, Raleigh, for plaintiff appellant.

Brassfield & Maupin, Robert L. Savage, Jr., Raleigh, for defendant appellee.


WINBORNE, Justice.

Did the court below err in granting defendant's motion for a judgment as of nonsuit at the conclusion of all the evidence? This is the question presented on this appeal.

In considering such motion, "the defendant's evidence, unless favorable to the plaintiff, is not to be taken into consideration, except when not in conflict with the plaintiff's evidence, it may be used to explain or make clear that which has been offered by the plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases