PARGETER v. CHICAGO & N. W. R. CO.


264 Wis. 250 (1953)

PARGETER, Appellant, vs. CHICAGO & NORTH WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 2, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Hugh F. Oldenburg, attorney, and Thomas H. Lucas of counsel, both of Madison, and oral argument by Mr. Oldenburg.

For the respondent there was a brief by E. H. Borgelt, Edmund W. Powell, and W. J. Roper, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. Roper.


GEHL, J.

Our conclusion that the court erred in finding as a matter of law that plaintiff was guilty of negligence in failing to stop before entering the crossing makes it unnecessary to recite more than we have of the facts.

Sec. 85.92 (1), Stats., provides as follows:

"(1) No operator of a vehicle shall drive on or across a grade crossing with the main-line tracks of any railroad or interurban railroad while...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases