COSTELLO v. SCHULT


265 Wis. 243 (1953)

COSTELLO, Respondent, vs. SCHULT and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

December 1, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Schmitt & Gullickson of Merrill, and oral argument by S. G. Gullickson.

For the respondent there was a brief by Sullivan & Beaudry of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Robert J. Beaudry.


GEHL, J.

Two essential questions are presented: Whether, upon defendants' appeal, we should reverse the order changing the answer to question 2 (b) of the verdict, and whether, upon plaintiff's motion to review, we should hold that the court erroneously reduced the award for pecuniary loss.

The highway at the scene of the accident runs in a generally easterly and westerly direction. Schult's home is on the south side thereof and his driveway intersects it...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases