RUZICKA v. RAGER


305 N.Y. 191 (1953)

Francis W. Ruzicka et al., Copartners Doing Business as "Ruzicka's", Respondents, v. Edward Rager, Appellant. Edward Rager, Appellant, v. Francis W. Ruzicka et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Court of Appeals of the State of New York.

Decided April 9, 1953


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lloyd Paul Stryker, Edward Rager, in person, and Harold W. Wolfram for Edward Rager, appellant.

David Haar for Francis W. Ruzicka and another, respondents, and Bernard H. Sandler for David Haar, respondent.

LOUGHRAN, Ch. J., LEWIS, DESMOND, DYE, FULD and FROESSEL, JJ., concur.


CONWAY, J.

The question presented for our determination is whether in an action to enforce a partnership claim, a counterclaim (here denominated "Third"), may be set up by which the appellant seeks to impose a "nonpartnership" liability against the partners (one of them a limited one) individually. There is a "Second" counterclaim, involving legal fees, which has been sustained as against the partnership but dismissed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases