1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 121 F.Supp.
  5. 121 F.Supp. 371 (1953)
 

HOY v. PROGRESS PATTERN CO.

Civ. A. No. 12846.

121 F.Supp. 371 (1953)

HOY et al. v. PROGRESS PATTERN CO.

United States District Court E. D. Michigan, S. D.

November 5, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Geo. W. Crockett, Jr., of Goodman, Crockett, Eden & Robb, Detroit, Mich., for plaintiffs.

Omar Hansen and Roy F. Andes, Detroit, Mich., for defendant.

THORNTON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs herein seek overtime compensation and liquidated damages pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act, Section 16(b), 29 U.S.C.A. § 216(b). Defendant, in filing its motion to dismiss, contends that this Court lacks jurisdiction for the reason that plaintiffs were not employees within the meaning and coverage of the Fair Labor Standards Act. The motion to dismiss was addressed to the original complaint filed by the plaintiff Hoy...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases