1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 258 S.W.2d
  5. 258 S.W.2d 233 (1953)
 

PAVING IMP. DIST. NO. 12 OF SPRINGDALE v. BROOKS

No. 5-74.

258 S.W.2d 233 (1953)

PAVING IMP. D1ST. NO. 12 OF SPRINGDALE et al. v. BROOKS et al.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

June 1, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ulys A. Lovell and James E. Evans, Springdale, for appellants.

Price Dickson and Peter G. Estes, Fayetteville, for appellees.

McFADDIN, Justice.

This is a direct attack on the assessments of benefits on one parcel of property. Appellants, Paving District No. 12 and Curb & Gutter District No. 11, are companion districts: No. 12 being for the purpose of paving, and No. 11 being for the purpose of curbing and guttering, a portion of Mc-Kinney Street in the City of Springdale, Arkansas. The ordinance, levying the assessment of benefits in each District, was duly passed and published by the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases