We think that the adoption by defendants of the title "Eerie," the same as that previously employed by plaintiff, in a magazine which also so closely duplicated the size, format, design and illustrated cover of plaintiff's magazine in the same "comic" field was bound to be confusing and constituted unfair competition.
Recognizing that plaintiff had no right to a monopoly on the use of the word "Eerie...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
