1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 264 Wis.
  5. 264 Wis. 215 (1953)
 

JOHNSON v. POFAHL

264 Wis. 215 (1953)

JOHNSON and others, Appellants, vs. POFAHL and wife, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

June 2, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief and oral argument by Harold M. Bode of Kenosha.

For the respondents there was a brief by Hammond & Hammond of Kenosha, and oral argument by Walter W. Hammond and Willis R. Hammond.

BROADFOOT, J.

Several rules as to the effect and validity of tax deeds are cited by the plaintiffs. They are not disputed and need not be discussed. The only question to be determined in this case is whether the plaintiffs' action is barred by sec. 75.26, Stats., which reads as follows:

"LIMITATION. (1) Grantee in deed. No action shall be maintained by the grantee or anyone claiming under him to recover the possession of any land or any interest therein...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases