FENTON v. MARGATE BRIDGE CO.


24 N.J. Super. 450 (1953)

94 A.2d 848

EZRA A. FENTON, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT, v. MARGATE BRIDGE COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided February 2, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Alexander K. Blatt argued the cause for the petitioner-respondent.

Mr. S.P. McCord, Jr., argued the cause for the respondent-appellant (Messrs. Starr, Summerill & Davis, attorneys; Mr. William F. Hyland, on the brief).

Before Judges EASTWOOD, BIGELOW and JAYNE.


The opinion of the court was delivered by EASTWOOD, S.J.A.D.

In this workmen's compensation case the dispositive question is whether the employee's injuries were caused by an accident that arose out of and in the course of his employment. On May 11, 1951, at about three minutes before 4:00 P.M., the petitioner-respondent Ezra A. Fenton, employed by the respondent-appellant Margate Bridge Company as a bridge tender and toll collector, suffered injuries when, at or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases