AMADO v. MALIBU DUDE RANCH


26 N.J. Super. 445 (1953)

98 A.2d 121

VERA SPOLAN AMADO, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MALIBU DUDE RANCH, A CORPORATION, AND LLOYD RACKMILL, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 23, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John E. Toolan argued the cause for plaintiff-appellant (Messrs. Toolan, Haney & Romond, attorneys).

Mr. James B. Emory argued the cause for defendants-respondents (Messrs. Emory, Langan & Lamb, attorneys).

Before Judges FREUND, STANTON and FRANCIS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.C.C. (temporarily assigned).

Appellant in this proceeding seeks to have an adverse verdict of a jury set aside as contrary to the weight of the evidence.

It appears that Miss Amado was a paying guest of respondent Malibu Dude Ranch. Among the activities offered to her was horseback riding.

On the day in question she and other guests, at the suggestion of respondent Rackmill, president of the ranch...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases