1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.2d
  4. 117 Cal.App.2d
  5. 117 Cal.App.2d 352 (1953)
 

HENNINGSEN v. HOWARD

Docket No. 15348.

117 Cal.App.2d 352 (1953)

255 P.2d 837

HELEN HENNINGSEN, Respondent, v. MOE HOWARD et al., Defendants; ALEC BARNARD et al., Appellants.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Two.

April 17, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shapro & Rothschild for Appellants.

O. Vincent Bruno and Harold Unterberg for Respondent.

NOURSE, P.J.

This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial after judgment for defendants by the court sitting without a jury. The amended complaint contained four causes of action, to the following effect: The first that Moe Howard, Meyer Winkleman, David Barnard and Alec Barnard individually and as copartners doing business under the name of Barnard Brothers Textile Division in June, 1949, in New York City bought and received from plaintiff's assignor textiles...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases