1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 95 Ohio
  5. 95 Ohio App. 367 (1953)
 

STATE, EX REL. HANRAHAN v. ZUPNIK

Nos. 22630, 22631, 22632 and 22633.

95 Ohio App. 367 (1953)

THE STATE, EX REL. HANRAHAN ET AL., APPELLEES, v. ZUPNIK ET AL., BD. OF TRUSTEES, ET AL., APPELLANTS. THE STATE, EX REL. HORN ET AL., APPELLEES, v. BATH ET AL., BD. OF TRUSTEES, ET AL., APPELLANTS. THE STATE, EX REL. BARRETT ET AL., APPELLEES, v. ZUPNIK ET AL., BD. OF TRUSTEES, ET AL., APPELLANTS. THE STATE, EX REL. ANKLAM ET AL., APPELLEES, v. BATH ET AL., BD. OF TRUSTEES, ET AL., APPELLANTS.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, Cuyahoga County.

Decided February 16, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Green, Lausche & Wilmot, and Mr. A. F. Gallagher, for appellees.

Mr. Joseph H. Crowley, director of law, Mr. James M. McSweeney and Mr. Burt J. Fulton, for appellants.

DOYLE, P. J.

The appeals in the four suits noted in the caption above are from judgments rendered in the Common Pleas Court of Cuyahoga County, where four separate actions in mandamus were consolidated for trial. The judgment in each case ordered a writ to issue. The many relators in each case instituted their respective suits not only for their own benefit, but for others similarly situated.

In the first (both in the Common Pleas Court and here) of the four...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases