1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 263 Wis.
  5. 263 Wis. 199 (1953)
 

ULLMAN v. FREYE

263 Wis. 199 (1953)

ULLMAN and wife, Appellants, vs. FREYE and another, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 3, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs and oral argument by Allan Cain of Kaukauna, attorney, and Henry P. Hughes of Oshkosh of counsel.

For the respondents there was a brief by Benton, Bosser, Becker & Fulton, and oral argument by Mr. David L. Fulton and Mr. John B. Menn, all of Appleton.

BROADFOOT, J.

The sole question before us is the sufficiency of the notice of injury. It is attacked only for the reason that the date of the accident is not specified therein. The defendants contend that the omission of the date is a fatal defect and because thereof it does not comply with the requirements of sec. 330.19 (5), Stats. They rely upon several cases decided by this court which we shall review briefly, in the order they are set out in the brief herein...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases