1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 263 Wis.
  5. 263 Wis. 191 (1953)
 

JOHNSON v. SIPE

263 Wis. 191 (1953)

JOHNSON, Administratrix, Respondent, vs. SIPE and another, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 3, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there was a brief by Stanley S. Chmiel and Bradford & Gabert, all of Appleton, and oral argument by Mr. Alfred S. Bradford and Mr. Chmiel.

For the respondent there was a brief by Benton, Bosser, Becker & Fulton, attorneys, and John B. Menn of counsel, all of Appleton, and oral argument by Mr. David L. Fulton and Mr. Menn.

MARTIN, J.

The jury found the appellant Sipe negligent with respect to lookout, speed, and management and control, and Johnson negligent with respect to the headlight and taillight on his scooter. It is appellants' contention that there is no evidence to support the finding that Donald Sipe was negligent, but that even if there were, Johnson was at least 50 per cent negligent as a matter of law.

As shown by the facts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases