WATERHOUSE v. PERRY


260 S.W.2d 176 (1953)

WATERHOUSE v. PERRY et ux.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

Rehearing Denied July 17, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carmack Waterhouse, Oak Ridge, for complainant.

O. W. McKenzie, Dayton, for defendants.


GAILOR, Justice.

This controversy rises from the use and occupancy of a certain tract of land in Rhea County by the defendants, Sam Perry and wife. The tract of land in controversy was formerly owned by Euclid Waterhouse, who died intestate in Rhea County in May 1950. His son, Carmack Waterhouse, has been duly appointed administrator of his father's estate, and is the complainant in the present controversy.

On September 11, 1950, in cause No. 3054 of the Chancery...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases