1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 208 F.2d
  5. 208 F.2d 228 (1953)
 

TURCHAN v. CINCINNATI MILLING MACHINE CO.

No. 11679.

208 F.2d 228 (1953)

TURCHAN v. CINCINNATI MILLING MACHINE CO.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

November 24, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert A. Sloman, Detroit, Mich., (Thomas S. Donnelly, Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for appellant.

David A. Woodcock, New York City, (John C. Blair, New York City, on the brief; Watson, Johnson, Leavenworth & Blair, New York City, Spencer Kuhn, Gatch, Kleinman, Roberts & Kuhn, Cincinnati, Ohio, of counsel; Harness, Dickey & Pierce, Detroit, Mich., on the docket), for appellee.

Before SIMONS, Chief Judge and ALLEN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

SIMONS, Chief Judge.

This is a companion case to Cincinnati Milling Machine Company v. Turchan, 6 Cir., 208 F.2d 222. It is here on a separate appeal supported by separate briefs and was separately argued. The appellant seeks to reverse an order denying appellant attorney fees incurred in the preparation of defenses to patents and claims withdrawn by the appellee from its patent infringement suit, both before and during trial.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases