1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 160 Ohio
  5. 160 Ohio St. 273 (1953)
 

BAUMAN v. WALTER

No. 33374.

160 Ohio St. 273 (1953)

BAUMAN, APPELLANT, v. WALTER ET AL., APPELLEES; HOGUE, ADMR., APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided December 9, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. Newcomer, Newcomer & Shaffer, for appellant Fred D. Bauman.

Messrs. Weaver & Weaver, Mr. Chas. T. Stahl and Messrs. Parker & Fenton, for appellees.

Mr. Lorin L. Hogue, for appellant Lorin L. Hogue, administrator.

TAFT, J.

We recognize that, where deposit obligations such as those in the instant case have been coupled with an additional obligation to pay to the survivor, such accounts have been frequently referred to as joint and survivorship accounts. However, the obligation of the bank was not to pay to the husband and the wife but to either the husband or the wife. Such language apparently expresses no intention...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases