1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Super.
  4. 174 Pa.Super.
  5. 174 Pa.Super. 252 (1953)
 

SMITH v. PA. P.U.C.

174 Pa.Super. 252 (1953)

Smith, Appellant, v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

December 29, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert P. Earle, with him William L. O'Hey, Jr. and Riely, Powell, Earle & Wetherill, for appellants.

Harris J. Latta, Jr., Assistant Counsel, with him Lloyd S. Benjamin, Counsel, for Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.

Peter Platten, with him Hamilton C. Connor, Jr., and Ballard, Spahr, Andrews & Ingersoll, for Philadelphia Transportation Company, intervenor, appellee.

Before RHODES, P.J., HIRT, RENO, ROSS, GUNTHER, WRIGHT and WOODSIDE, JJ.

OPINION BY RHODES, P.J., December 29, 1953:

This is an appeal by certain individuals from an order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission of June 30, 1953, granting the Philadelphia Transportation Company a certificate of public convenience evidencing commission approval of abandonment of street railway service on its Rail Route 181 in the City of Philadelphia.

The principal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases