The plaintiff sues to recover the purchase price because of defects in the carpeting. The action against the retailer is essentially based on a rescission of the contract of sale, and the plaintiff makes no claim for damages for the breach of warranty.
The right to rescind is not necessarily barred by the fact that the carpeting remained on the floor until commencement of the action. There was evidence...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
