BLUT v. KATZ


13 N.J. 374 (1953)

99 A.2d 785

GUSSIE BLUT, AS EXECUTRIX UNDER THE LAST WILL AND TESTAMENT OF ISAAC BLUT, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT AND CROSS-RESPONDENT, v. BENJAMIN KATZ AND HERMAN MARKS, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS AND CROSS-APPELLANTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided October 13, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Hymen D. Goldberg argued the cause for respondents and cross-appellants (Mr. Abram Waks, attorney).

Mr. Harry Chashin argued the cause for appellant and cross-respondent (Mr. Hyman W. Rosenthal, on the brief; Messrs. Marcus & Levy, attorneys).


The opinion of the court was delivered by WACHENFELD, J.

We granted cross-petitions for certification in this cause, in which the dispute between the widow of a deceased partner and the surviving partners concerns her efforts to be paid for her deceased husband's share in the partnership business and the endeavors of the surviving partners to recover from the widow amounts paid to others to perform the work normally performed by the decedent.

In 1925 five...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases