Per Curiam.
From the evidence presented, it appears that the petitioner was in lawful custody, charged with a violation of probation. It also appears that the petitioner was brought before the court, that no counsel for him was present, that no statement by anyone charging violation of the terms of probation was made, and that the court summarily revoked probation and made its order accordingly.
In State v. Nowak, Jr.,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.