NOTKIN v. BROOKDALE GARDENS


28 N.J. Super. 9 (1953)

99 A.2d 825

ESTHER NOTKIN AND LOUIS NOTKIN, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. BROOKDALE GARDENS, INC., DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided October 21, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Harry Chasin argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Hyman W. Rosenthal and Max D. Forrest on the brief; Messrs. Marcus & Levy, attorneys).

Mr. James J. Langan argued the cause for the respondent (Messrs. Emory, Langan & Lamb, attorneys).

Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and FRANCIS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by FRANCIS, J.A.D.

This is a landlord and tenant, personal injury, negligence action. At the conclusion of the trial the jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendant. Appellants seek a reversal of the consequent judgment, contending that the trial court erred in allowing the introduction of prejudicially incompetent evidence.

At the time in question respondent was the owner of a garden apartment development in Bloomfield...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases