KLEIN v. GREENSTEIN


24 N.J. Super. 348 (1953)

94 A.2d 497

ETHEL KLEIN, ET AL., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANTS, v. MAX GREENSTEIN, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 28, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. W. Louis Bossle argued the cause for the appellants.

Mr. Bernard Eskin (of the Pennsylvania Bar), argued the cause for the respondents (Messrs. Wolf, Block, Schorr and Solis-Cohen (of the Pennsylvania Bar), of counsel; Messrs. Starr, Summerill & Davis, attorneys).

Before Judges EASTWOOD, BIGELOW and JAYNE.


The opinion of the court was delivered by BIGELOW, J.A.D.

The plaintiffs appeal from a judgment rendered in the Chancery Division dismissing their complaint. The plaintiffs, who are stockholders of the defendant Camden Grocers Exchange, allege that the company yearly, since 1941, has paid extra dividends to many of its stockholders but not to plaintiffs. They seek a judgment in an amount equal to what they allege would...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases