KINZFOGL v. GREINER


265 Wis. 105 (1953)

KINZFOGL, Respondent, vs. GREINER and others, Appellants.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 3, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellants there were briefs by Michael, Spohn, Best & Friedrich, attorneys, and George A. Schutt and Roy C. La Budde of counsel, all of Milwaukee, and oral argument by Mr. La Budde.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by Ben L. Chernov of Milwaukee.


BROADFOOT, J.

The defendants contend that the first cause of action should be dismissed for the reason that the oral contract contained a provision for increasing commissions after five years, and it is therefore void under the provisions of the statute of frauds, sec. 241.02 (1). There are allegations in the record that the only time the term of employment was discussed was at the time of the original hiring, and that plaintiff's employment was for an indefinite...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases