1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 264 Wis.
  5. 264 Wis. 106 (1953)
 

MAXWELL v. FINK

264 Wis. 106 (1953)

MAXWELL and another, Respondents, vs. FINK, Executrix, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

May 5, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Dougherty, Arnold & Waters of Milwaukee, and Jeffris, Mouat, Oestreich, Wood & Cunningham of Janesville, and oral argument by Suel O. Arnold and by Harry F. Knipp of Janesville.

For the respondents there was a brief by Vaudreuil & Vaudreuil of Kenosha, and oral argument by Leo E. Vaudreuil.

CURRIE, J.

Counsel for the defendant raise the following issues on this appeal:

(1) Was it error for the trial court to permit the plaintiff to introduce evidence as to the improper use of the flaps on the airplane?

(2) Was there credible evidence to sustain the findings of the jury that Howard R. Fink was causally negligent with respect to the use of the flaps?

(3) Was it error for the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases