1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wis.
  4. 263 Wis.
  5. 263 Wis. 104 (1953)
 

STARZINSKI v. STARZINSKI

263 Wis. 104 (1953)

STARZINSKI, Respondent, vs. STARZINSKI, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

February 3, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there was a brief by Krueger & Fulmer of Wausau, and oral argument by William F. Krueger.

For the respondent there was a brief by Clayton J. Crooks, and oral argument by Clayton J. Crooks and Leo D. Crooks, both of Wausau.

GEHL, J.

The defendant makes no serious attack upon that part of the judgment which grants plaintiff a divorce. His complaint is that the award given her in the division of the estate is excessive; that it so appears without regard to the evidence discovered by him after judgment; and that if he is wrong in that respect the judgment should be vacated or, in the alternative, a new trial granted in order that the court might consider such newly discovered evidence in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases