DAVISON, J.
The only question presented by this appeal is as to the applicability of the Intangible Personal Property Tax Law, 68 O.S. 1941 § 1501 et seq. The case comes here by transcript and bill of exceptions.
By way of an amended petition, the plaintiff, J.F. Hicks, sought to recover from the defendant, Fred Calhoun, the sum of $990.87. It was alleged that the defendant was employed to manage and operate a drugstore belonging to
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.