1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 79 S.E.2d
  5. 79 S.E.2d 264 (1953)
 

PREVATTE v. PREVATTE

No. 680.

79 S.E.2d 264 (1953)

239 N.C. 120

PREVATTE v. PREVATTE

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

December 16, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert Weinstein and F. D. Hackett, Lumberton, for defendant-appellee.

PER CURIAM.

This was a suit for divorce a mensa. From order denying motion for alimony pendente lite the plaintiff gave notice of appeal and attempted to appeal in forma pauperis. However, it appears that there was no order allowing appeal in forma pauperis after the filing of affidavit of poverty subsequent to the term. G.S. § 1-288. True, the judge wrote in the judgment "plaintiff allowed to appeal in forma pauperis upon compliance with the statute," but this...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases