MATTER OF UNITED PIECE DYE WORKS v. JOSEPH


282 A.D. 60 (1953)

In the Matter of United Piece Dye Works, Petitioner, v. Lazarus Joseph, as Comptroller of The City of New York, et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

May 12, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Phillip W. Haberman, Jr., of counsel (Wilbur H. Friedman and Gerald Silbert with him on the brief; Proskauer Rose Goetz & Mendelsohn, attorneys), for petitioner.

Leroy Mandle of counsel (Seymour B. Quel and Stanley Buchsbaum with him on the brief; Denis M. Hurley, Corporation Counsel, attorney), for respondents.

DORE, J. P., COHN and VAN VOORHIS, JJ., concur with BREITEL, J.; CALLAHAN, J., dissents in opinion.


BREITEL, J.

Since the principles discussed in Matter of United Air Lines v. Joseph (282 App. Div. 48) decided simultaneously herewith, are also involved in this case, the discussion will not be repeated. It will be assumed however that the previous discussion is considered the ground for what follows here.

This case involves the imposition of the New York City gross receipts tax (Administrative Code...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases