O'BRIEN v. HESSMAN


265 Wis. 63 (1953)

O'BRIEN, Appellant, vs. HESSMAN, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

November 3, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the appellant there were briefs and oral argument by Noreen Gough Bengston and Warren K. Bengston, both of Madison.

For the respondent there was a brief and oral argument by George A. Solsrud of Madison.


BROADFOOT, J.

The demurrer was properly sustained. The allegations of fraud in the complaint are conclusions of law and raise no issue. The complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

Essentially this was an action to recover damages for the wrongful death of Amanda O'Brien. The note in the prior action was executed on December 5, 1941. The alteration of the note, if any occurred, took place more than two years before the commencement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases