BERNSTEIN v. BERNSTEIN


282 A.D. 30 (1953)

Dorothy W. Bernstein, Respondent, v. Daniel W. Bernstein, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Fourth Department.

May 27, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Samuel Schwartz and Joseph C. Mennella for appellant.

Cyril J. Kendall and John J. Kiegher for respondent.

All concur. Present — TAYLOR, P. J., McCURN, VAUGHAN, KIMBALL and WHEELER, JJ.


Per Curiam.

By order to show cause, the defendant-appellant sought an order amending the final decree of annulment rendered herein to eliminate therefrom the provision requiring said defendant-appellant to pay the sum of $20 per week for the support and maintenance of the daughter of the parties. Upon the argument of the motion, it appeared that the said daughter was temporarily employed at the Eastman Kodak Company...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases