HIRSCH v. ASSOCIATED AMUSEMENT MACH. OPERATORS OF N.Y., INC.


205 Misc. 105 (1953)

Joseph Hirsch, Appellant, v. Associated Amusement Machine Operators of New York, Inc., Respondent.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term, First Department.

October 29, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jerome G. Rosenhaus and Robert Markewich for appellant.

Theodore Blatt and Harry Silver for respondent.

EDER, SCHREIBER and HECHT, JJ., concur.


Per Curiam.

The court below seemingly dismissed the complaint upon the ground that the promise of the defendant to pay the plaintiff severance pay upon his submitting his written resignation was an unenforcible obligation lacking consideration. This was error. The submission of plaintiff's written resignation was sufficient consideration for the promise to pay him severance pay. We do not at this time pass upon the question whether the refusal of the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases