1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Pa.Super.
  4. 174 Pa.Super.
  5. 174 Pa.Super. 132 (1953)
 

REED v. PA. P.U.C.

174 Pa.Super. 132 (1953)

Reed, Appellant, v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

November 11, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Francis Fisher and Louis Vaira, with them Brenlove & Fisher, for appellants.

Jack F. Aschinger, Assistant Counsel, with him Lloyd S. Benjamin, Counsel for Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, appellee.

Walter T. Wardzinski, with him Henry G. Wasson, Jr., Ira R. Hill and Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, for Company, intervening appellee.

Before RHODES, P.J., HIRT, RENO, ROSS and WRIGHT, JJ.

OPINION BY RHODES, P.J., November 11, 1953:

These appeals are from interim orders of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission denying petitions of certain property owners to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction the applications of the Duquesne Light Company for Commission approval of the exercise of the power of eminent domain under the Act of May 21, 1921, P.L. 1057, § 1, 15 PS § 1182.

On February 28, 1953, the Duquesne Light Company filed similar...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases