1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 24 N.J.
  5. 24 N.J. Super. 277 (1953)
 

KRAUSS v. A. & M. KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.

24 N.J. Super. 277 (1953)

94 A.2d 339

WENDEL KRAUSS, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. A. & M. KARAGHEUSIAN, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 13, 1953.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Martin J. Kole argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Stein & Stein, attorneys; Mr. Frederick Z. Feldman, on the brief).

Mr. Sol D. Kapelsohn argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Kapelsohn, Lerner, Leuchter & Reitman, attorneys; Mr. Irving Leuchter, on the brief).

Mr. Clarence F. McGovern argued the cause for Board of Review, Division of Employment Security, Department of Labor and Industry.

Before Judges McGEEHAN, BIGELOW and JAYNE.

The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.

Counsel for the defendant-appellant represents the controversial question projected by this appeal to be one of novel impression in the domain of judicial review. It emanates from the administration of our Unemployment Compensation Law (R.S. 43:21-1), which originated in the statutory law of our State in 1936. L. 1936, c. 270. Parallel legislation exists today in all 48 states, Alaska, the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases