DUNCAN J.
The defendant argues that a finding of contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff was compelled as a matter of law because of his admitted speed, and his failure to anticipate the defendant's conduct (Fine v. Parella, 92 N.H. 81; Tufts v. White, 92 N.H. 158), and to avoid the accident by using "the almost thirty feet of pavement," presumably to the left of the Smart car before it commenced its turn.
In support...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
