FARMER et al.
v.
UNITED ELECTRICAL, RADIO & MACHINE WORKERS OF AMERICA (UE), et al.
FARMER et al.
v.
AMERICAN COMMUNICATIONS ASS'N.
FARMER et al.
v.
INTERNATIONAL FUR & LEATHER WORKERS UNION OF UNITED STATES AND CANADA.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued June 16, 1953.
Decided December 4, 1953.
Writ of Certiorari Denied April 12, 1954.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Mr. David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D. C., was on the brief for appellants.
Mr. David Scribner, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, for appellees United Electrical, Radio & Machine Workers of America et al. Mr. David Rein, Washington, D. C., entered an appearance for appellees.
Mr. Victor Rabinowitz, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, for appellee American Communications Ass'n. Mr. David Rein, Washington, D. C., entered an appearance for appellee.
Mr. Harold I. Cammer, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, for appellee International Fur & Leather Workers Union etc. Mr. David Rein, Washington, D. C., entered an appearance for appellee.
Before PRETTYMAN, PROCTOR and BAZELON, Circuit Judges.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Writ of Certiorari Denied April 12, 1954. See 74 S.Ct. 638.
BAZELON, Circuit Judge.
Each of the three appellee labor unions in these consolidated appeals filed a suit for declaratory judgment and injunction in the District Court against appellants, all members of the National Labor Relations Board. These suits were based on the following course of events. The Unions' officers had filed non-Communist affidavits pursuant to the requirements of § 9(h) of...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
