CITY OF CAMBRIDGE v. P. U. C.

No. 33178.

159 Ohio St. 88 (1953)

CITY OF CAMBRIDGE, APPELLANT, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 4, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Daniel D. Knowlton, city solicitor, and Mr. Charles J. Chastang, for appellant.

Mr. C. William O'Neill, attorney general, Mr. James M. Burtch, Jr., and Mr. John P. Case, for appellee.


HART, J.

The city asserts that alleged needs of the company for increased rates to cover cost of increased wages, to provide proper maintenance of its plant and property, to cover operating expenses and taxes, and to provide funds to meet interest requirements and dividends on its preferred stock and reasonable dividends on its common stock do not constitute an emergency within the purview of Section 614-32, General Code, and that the motion to dismiss the application...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases