DIXON v. MAYO


64 So.2d 176 (1953)

DIXON v. MAYO.

Supreme Court of Florida, Division B.

April 7, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E.M. Dixon, in pro. per.

Richard W. Ervin, Atty. Gen. and Reeves Bowen, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.


PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard upon the original writ of habeas corpus and the respondent's return. It now appears to the court that the petitioner was not entitled to the writ because his period of incarceration had not expired due to the provisions of the sentence that thirty days be added to the original period in the event he did not pay the costs, and his failure to pay the same.

ROBERTS, C.J., and THOMAS, HOBSON and DREW...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases