IN RE RICHEY

No. 5744.

76 Ariz. 152 (1953)

261 P.2d 673

In re RICHEY et al.

Supreme Court of Arizona.

October 13, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Wilmer and Walton & Walton, of Phoenix, Robert Barber and Wm. G. Hall, Tucson, of counsel, for respondents.

Richard B. Evans and James M. Murphy, of Tucson, for State Bar of Arizona.


PER CURIAM.

W. Shelley Richey and Norman S. Herring, hereinafter called respondents, attorneys at law regularly admitted to practice before this court, were cited to appear and answer charges of unprofessional conduct before Local Administrative Committee for District No. 3, sitting at Tucson, Arizona.

Specifically the respondents were charged with violating canons of ethics numbered 6, 22, and 29, which deal with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases