PORTER v. BARTON

No. 4177.

98 N.H. 104 (1953)

ARTHUR E. PORTER, Adm'r v. DAVID BARTON.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire.

March 3, 1953.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur E. Porter for the plaintiff.

Upton, Sanders & Upton (Mr. Frederic K. Upton orally), for the defendant.


LAMPRON, J.

Plaintiff gives two reasons why defendant's plea should have been overruled. First, he failed to prove that Locke was an employee subject to the Workmen's Compensation Law. Second, assuming Locke could be found to be such an employee, defendant failed to prove that he, Barton, was subject to that Law or that he had complied with its requirements.

Locke began working for defendant sometime prior to November 5, 1949, as a woodchopper. He was assigned...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases